SELECTION BIAS: Introduction 5

article_8192
This finding, in conjunction with our evidence that the impact of the program measured in the region of common support differs from the overall impact of the program, reveals an important limitation of all nonexperimental methods for evaluating social programs. Even when these methods solve the selection problem, they can only identify the effect of treatment for participants who have counterparts in the comparison group. further
Our discovery of the empirical importance of imposing a common support condition in reducing bias as conventionally measured demonstrates the benefit of the nonparametric approach to econometrics. Rigorous application of nonparametric methods entails careful specification of the domain over which estimators can be identified and consistently estimated.
Continue reading

SELECTION BIAS: Introduction 4

1360678139
The third type of estimator whose identifying assumptions we test is an extension of the widely-used method of “difference-in-differences”. Conditional on P, outcomes of participants before and after they participate in a program are differenced and differenced again with respect to before and after differences for members of the comparison group. The unconditional version of this estimator and its close cousin – the fixed effects estimator – are widely used. The assumptions required to justify the conditional version of this estimator are weaker than those required to justify matching. They are generally supported by our data. The effectiveness of the conditional difference-in-differences estimator is consistent with our evidence that the index-sufficient model characterizes bias. Since in our data selection bias as a function of P is constant over time for most values of P, it can be differenced out. Have you ever heard about payday loans speedy cash? Would you like to get the same loans but with a much more reasonable rate? You are welcome to get one at read. Where we make sure our rates are competitive and our clients are always very happy they preferred our services. Try for yourself and see.
Continue reading

SELECTION BIAS: Introduction 3

In particular, we test the nonparametric identifying assumptions that justify three widely-used types of estimators for eliminating selection bias. The first type of estimator is the class of “index-sufficient” models introduced in Heckman (1980), which assumes that mean selection bias depends only on Py the probability of being selected into the program. The original parametric econometric models of selection bias are special cases of the index-sufficient model. We develop and apply a new test of index sufficiency and find support for this characterization of bias. However, the functional form of the index-sufficient selection bias that we estimate is different from that assumed in traditional econometric selection models. Regions of support where the selection bias for nonparticipants is negligible are required in order to use the index-sufficient selection estimator to construct the counterfactuals required to evaluate programs. Such regions are not found in our data. To produce them requires a comprehensive sampling plan for collecting the data on comparison group members. read only
Continue reading

SELECTION BIAS: Introduction 2

21775_640
Our analysis is based on the following principles. Neither the experimental control group nor the comparison group we analyze receives treatment, so that differences in measured outcomes between the two groups can be attributed solely to selection bias. Instead of examining the performance of specific parametric estimators based on specific sets of regressors in eliminating selection bias, as LaLonde (1986) and scholars who follow him have done, we use semiparametric econometric methods to estimate the functional form of the selection bias directly using a variety of different regressors and data sets. We use the estimated bias functions to test identifying assumptions that have been maintained in the literature, and to suggest estimators that might be effective in eliminating selection bias in future evaluations of similar programs. Our method for characterizing bias is general and can be applied in a variety of settings, including the study of the analytically similar problem of sample attrition. Would you like to learn more about payday loans with easy approval process that could have you solve your financial troubles in just a few hours? Money can’t buy happiness, but it can help get peace of mind or make someone happy with an unexpected gift. Get funded here at More info and feel in control again.
Continue reading